Lophocheilus obscurus group (specimen #034)

Lophocheilus obscurus group (specimen #034)

Workbook

Collected in Malaise trap (GMP66364) during the week 12th -19th September 2026 (specimen ID #034)


THYNNINAE: Thynnini: Lophocheilus obscurus ‘group’

Having worked through the various options, I am confident that this is Lophocheilus. The genus is known from our local region, and meets the diagnostic criteria described by Brown (2025).

It looks a good match for Lophocheilus obscurus, based on the Lophocheilus species key in Brown 2025 (pp. 764-5) and associated ‘remarks’.

Note that this ‘group’ is likely to include a number of undescribed species, and Brown notes that they may actually represent a distinct, new genus. For now, Lophocheilus obscurus is a useful placeholder.



The following is my justification for excluding other options among the Thynnidae and Tiphiidae.

Thynninae: Thynnini

Family THYNNIDAE, based on:

  • 3 submarginal cells & frons produced above antennal sockets (so not Tiphiidae: Tiphiinae)

Subfamily THYNNINAE, based on:

  • frons produced above antennal sockets (so NOT Anthoboscinae)

  • forewing with distinct 1r vein (so NOT Myzininae)

  • forewing with 2m-cu meeting SCIII (so NOT Diamminae)

Tribe THYNNINI, based on:

  • forewing with distinct 1r vein (so NOT Iswaroidini)

  • clypeus with distinct, sagittal carina (so unlike MOST Agriomyini)

  • large (so NOT Agriomyini)

  • clypeal carina not obviously branched (unlike MOST Rhagigasterini)

  • hypopygium with weakly upturned apical spine (so NOT Rhagigasterini)

  • hypostoma expanded (so NOT Rhagigasterini)

  • 3rd interval of M distinctly longer than 2nd interval, and longer than half length of 2r-m (so NOT Iswaroidini, NOT Agriomyini) (unlike MOST Tachynomyini)

  • epipygium strongly rounded (so NOT Tachynomyini)

  • hypopygium not flat (so NOT Tachynomyini)

  • posterior surface of head rounded (unlike MOST Tachynomyini)

There are seven genera of Thynnini known to occur in our region (far south of NSW and/or eastern Victoria): Catocheilus; Elidothynnus; Guerinius; Keteiothynnus; Levothynnus; Lophocheilus; Thynnoides.

I can exclude six of these, based on:

  • antennal prominence NOT bulbous above each antennal insertion (so NOT Catocheilus - cf Brown 2025 Fig. 424c, p. 670)(also, NOT Guerinius)

  • clypeus WITH simple, sagittal carina (so NOT Catocheilus, Guerinius, Levothynnus, Thynnoides)

  • antennal prominence relatively simple (medially emarginate and slightly raised over each antennal socket, with just a trace of an oblique carina ventrally) (so NOT Catocheilus, Elidothynnus, Guerinius)

  • S6 WITHOUT posterolateral spines (so NOT Keteiothynnus)

  • epipygium WITHOUT subapical plate (so NOT Guerinius, Keteiothynnus)

  • S1; medially longitudinally raised but WITHOUT sharp carina (so NOT Thynnoides)

This leaves Lophocheilus as a possibility.

A further five genera of Thynnini are known to occur in south-eastern Australia more broadly: Leptothynnus; Lestricothynnus; Macrothynnus; Thynnus; Zaspilothynnus.

I can exclude each of these, as follows:

  • clypeus WITH sagittal carina (so NOT Leptothynnus)

  • head, mesosoma, metasoma black; yellow only on clypeus & mandibles (so NOT Macrothynnus, Thynnus, Zaspilothynnus) & (unlike MOST Lestrichothynnus)

  • epipygium WITHOUT carinae (no NOT one of the all-black species of Lestricothynnus)


References

Brown, G. 2025. Revision of the Australian Thynnidae and Tiphiidae (Hymenoptera). Zootaxa 5681 (1): 001-862 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5681.1.1


This is a workbook page … a part of our website where we record the observations and references used in making species identifications. The notes will not necessarily be complete. They are a record for our own use, but we are happy to share this information with others.