Lophocheilus fervens complex (specimen #072)

Lophocheilus fervens complex (specimen #072)

Workbook

Collected in Malaise trap (GMP66369) during the week 17th -24th October 2026 (specimen ID #072)


THYNNINAE: Thynnini: Lophocheilus

Having worked through the various options, I am confident that specimen #072 is Lophocheilus. It aligns with the diagnostic criteria Brown (2025) listed for the genus, including:

  • body and wing colouration

  • clypeus shape (narrowly truncate, sagittally carinate)

  • antennal prominence shape (slightly raised but not swollen)

  • S1 weakly medially raised

  • epipygium without subapical plate

Lophocheilus fervens complex (or ‘ms6’)

Based on the latest key to Lophocheilus males (Brown 2025), specimen #072 is near Lophocheilus fervens. Brown (2025) notes that L. fervens represents a complex of at least three species.



The following is my justification for excluding other options among the Thynnidae and Tiphiidae.

Thynninae: Thynnini

Family THYNNIDAE, based on:

  • 3 submarginal cells & frons produced above antennal sockets (so not Tiphiidae: Tiphiinae)

Subfamily THYNNINAE, based on:

  • frons produced above antennal sockets (so NOT Anthoboscinae)

  • forewing with distinct 1r vein (so NOT Myzininae)

  • forewing with 2m-cu meeting SCIII (so NOT Diamminae)

Tribe Thynnini, based on:

  • S1 without anterior V-shaped carina (so NOT Rhagigasterini)

  • hypopygium without long, strongly upturned apical spine (unlike most Rhagigasterini)

  • forewing 3rd interval of M vein longer than half 2r-m, only slightly shorter than 2nd interval (so NOT Iswaroidini, Agriomyini)

  • forewing 1r vein distinct (so NOT Agriomyini)

  • clypeus sagittally carinate (so NOT Agriomyini), carina simple & unbranched (unlike most Rhagigasterini)

  • epipygium rounded, not flat (unlike most Tachynomyini)

  • epipygium with long apical membrane (unlike

  • pronotum long (so NOT Tachynomyini)

It is a very good match for Lophocheilus. In addition, I’ve excluded other Thynnini genera from south-eastern Australia on a range of criteria, including:

  • clypeus sagittally carinate (so NOT Catocheilus, Guerinius, Leptothynnus, Lestricothynnus, Levothynnus, Thynnoides)

  • epipygium without subapical plate (so NOT Guerinius, Keteiothynnus, Macrothynnus, Thynnus, Zaspilothynnus)(unlike most Leptothynnus)

  • antennal prominence broadly rounded, not narrowly V-shaped (so NOT Elidothynnus)

  • S1 medially longitudinally raised (so NOT Elidothynnus), but not carinate or tuberculate (so NOT Thynnoides)


References

Brown, G. 2025. Revision of the Australian Thynnidae and Tiphiidae (Hymenoptera). Zootaxa 5681 (1): 001-862 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5681.1.1


This is a workbook page … a part of our website where we record the observations and references used in making species identifications. The notes will not necessarily be complete. They are a record for our own use, but we are happy to share this information with others.