Tachynomyia fervens (specimen 2610C)

Tachynomyia fervens (specimen 2610C)

Workbook

Specimen collected by hand 13th Oct 2026, found on leaf with female (also collected, as Specimen 2610D).


Thynninae: Tachynomini: Tachynomyia

Having worked through the various options, I am confident that this is Tachynomyia. The genus is known from our local region, and meets the diagnostic criteria described by Brown (2025).

Notable diagnostic features of male Tachynomyia include:

  • head strongly concave posteriorly, concavity with carinate margin and fringe of long setae

  • gena with digitate process near base of mandible


Tachynomyia fervens

Specimen 2610C keys out to Tachynomia fervens, a species known from southeastern Australia, including the Melbourne region. In comparison with Figure 317 (Brown 2025), it looks a match. Although Figure 317 does not show the apical part of the forewings, I note that the original species description includes “wings hyaline, the marginal cell with a slight fuscous cloud” (Smith 1859).



The following is my justification for excluding other options among the Thynnidae and Tiphiidae.

Thynninae: Tachynomyini: Tachynomyia

Family THYNNIDAE, based on:

  • 3 submarginal cells & frons produced above antennal sockets (so not Tiphiidae: Tiphiinae)

Subfamily THYNNINAE, based on:

  • frons produced above antennal sockets (so NOT Anthoboscinae)

  • forewing with distinct 1r vein (so NOT Myzininae)

  • forewing with 2m-cu meeting SCIII (so NOT Diamminae)

Tribe Tachynomyini most likely, based on:

  • forewing with distinct 1r vein (so NOT Iswaroidini)

  • forewing with 3rd interval of M much shorter than 2nd interval and less than half length of 2r-m (so NOT Thynnini)

  • hypopygium with strong apical spine (so NOT Agriomyini)(so NOT Eirone)

  • apical spine of hypopygium not strongly upturned (so NOT Rhagigasterini)

Among the Tachynomini, there are six Australian genera, only four of which are known from south-eastern Australia. Specimen 2610C is a good match for genus Tachynomyia. I can exclude the other five on a the basis of morphology, as follows:

  • head strongly concave posteriorly, carinate, and fringed with long setae (so NOT Ariphron, Phymatothynnus, Wrangathynnus)

  • genae with digitate process near base of mandible (so NOT Tachyphron, Tachynoides)


References

Brown, G. 2001. Status of the Ariphron generic group (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae): A critical review. Australian Journal of Entomology 40: 23–40

Brown, G. 2025. Revision of the Australian Thynnidae and Tiphiidae (Hymenoptera). Zootaxa 5681(1): 001-862 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5681.1.1


This is a workbook page … a part of our website where we record the observations and references used in making species identifications. The notes will not necessarily be complete. They are a record for our own use, but we are happy to share this information with others.