Paul WhitingtonBatch 6

Xyloperga halidaii vs. Xyloperga amenaida

Paul WhitingtonBatch 6
Xyloperga halidaii vs. Xyloperga amenaida

Xyloperga halidaii and Xyloperga amenaida are very similar in appearance.

The original descriptions of these species by Kirby (1882) and Westwood (1880) are brief, unclear and ambiguous, making it difficult to separate them confidently from field photographs.

On this page, I have detailed the morphology of 3 Xyloperga specimens collected in the field. My goal is to use this information to align features visible in field photographs with the original species descriptions of X. halidaii and X. amenaida.


Summary of findings to date

  • A comparison of specimens A, B and C with published descriptions of X. halidaii and X. amenaida strongly suggests that A and B are a female and male of X. halidaii while C is a female of X. amenaida.

  • This conclusion is supported by the strong similarity between specimen B and a BOLD specimen of a male identified as X. halidaii.

  • Discrepancies between features in these specimens and the published descriptions may stem from the brevity of the latter. I hope to obtain photos of the holotypes of both species to clarify the situation.


Observations of specimens

Specimen A

Specimen A is a female, collected by Marianne Broug (iNaturalist observation) at Belair SA in January 2026 (specimen #PW076). It was found dead on a road. Antennae and some leg segments are missing, the mesonotum split but otherwise the insect is intact. While lacking antennae, it shows the following characters which are diagnostic of genus Xyloperga: scutellum convex, with well developed hind lobes; head swollen behind the eyes; clypeus with a transverse fold in the middle.


Specimen B

Specimen B is a male, collected by Chris Pease (@cole0ptera, iNaturalist observation) near Eumundi, Qld on 20/1/26 (specimen #PW085). It shows the following diagnostic characters of genus Xyloperga: 7-segmented antenna, shorter than the width of the head; scutellum convex, with well developed hind lobes; head swollen behind the eyes; clypeus with a transverse fold in the middle.


Specimen C

Specimen C is a female collected by James Peake, (iNaturalist observation) at Mt. Buller, Vic on 23/12/25 (specimen #PW077). It shows the following diagnostic characters of genus Xyloperga: 7-segmented antenna, shorter than the width of the head; scutellum convex, with well developed hind lobes; head swollen behind the eyes; clypeus with a transverse fold in the middle.


Comparison of specimens A, B, C from above observations

Click on the image below to download a high resolution pdf version (54KB).

Summary:

  • There are few differences between specimen A (a female) and specimen B (a male) - indicated by the red text in the Specimen A row. These include degree of punctation of the scutellum, size of the yellow patch on the middle lobe of the mesonotum, degree of pilosity of the mesoscutum and colour of mesosternum (black vs. transparent orange) and venter (black vs yellow).

  • In contrast, there are many differences between specimens A and C - indicated by the bold text in the Specimen A and C rows. The most significant are head colour and morphology (pattern of stripes on vertex, relative genae vs. head width), scutellum colour and morphology, different V-mark on middle lobe of mesoscutum, mesepisternum colour and saw morphology.

The last two characters - mesepisternum colour and saw morphology - are included in published descriptions of X. halidaii and X. amenaida and therefore play a key role in species delimitation. The other characters - head morphology and scutellum morphology/colour - were either not recorded or only superficially described in published descriptions.


How representative are Specimens A, B, C of other iNaturalist observations?

The descriptions of specimens A, B, C will be used to assist species identification of X. amenaida and X. halidaii in iNaturalist field photos. It is therefore important to know whether these specimens are representative of iNaturalist observations.

The following table shows whether the iNaturalist observation listed matches specimens A, B or C. Features that don’t match that specimen are noted.

Click on the thumbnail to download a full PDF version (59KB).

Summary:

iNaturalist observations of X. amenaida/halidaii fall clearly into 2 groups, corresponding to specimens A/B (female/male) and specimen C (female).

I conclude that the specimens are representative of iNat observations.

There are minor differences between individuals within each of these groups:
- some insects in group C are strongly melanistic, showing thick black stripes on the vertex reaching to the ocelli, rather than narrow, short stripes and thicker black stripes on the scutellum
- the apex of the otherwise orange hind tibia is black in some individuals in group B
- the hind femur is clearly dilated in some individuals in group B but not in others


Differences between X. amenaida and X. halidaii in published descriptions

The matrix below compares features of X. amenaida and X. halidaii extracted from published descriptions of these species by a range of authors.

Red text highlights features that differ between these species.

Click on the image to download a pdf of the matrix (871KB).

Summary of distinguishing features in published descriptions:

  1. Post-ocellar region of X. halidaii is densely punctured, apart from a patch behind the hind ocelli, whereas it is unpunctured in X. amenaida

  2. Scutellum of X. halidaii is yellow and thickly punctured. In X. amenaida the midline furrow is deep and yellow in colour, sometimes with a brownish-black (in male) or reddish-yellow (in female) area in the apical half.

  3. Mesepisternum of X. amenaida is yellow (in male) or red (in female), whereas in X. halidaii it is shiny black with a yellow transverse band

  4. Saw of X. halidaii has large teeth with numerous fine secondary teeth, whereas in X. amenaida it has numerous primary teeth

  5. Hind femur of male of X. amenaida is dilated. There is no mention of this in X. halidaii.

  6. Thickened (incrassate) hairs on apex of front tibia in X. amenaida, whereas these are absent in X. halidaii.

  7. Hind basitarsus in X. amenaida is only as long as breadth of apex of tibia and scarcely 1.5x its own apical breadth, whereas in X. halidaii it is longer than the apex of hind tibia and more than 2x as long as its own apical breadth.


Comparing specimens A, B, C to published descriptions

I have chosen features 1-5 from the list above. Features 6 and 7 could not be assessed with confidence in the specimens.

Click on the image to download a pdf of the table (29KB)

Conclusions:

There is a match between features in specimen A and diagnostic characters for X. halidaii. Notably, this includes saw morphology.

Features in specimen B match the diagnostic characters for X. halidaii except for the hind femur morphology. X. amenaida males are reported to have a dilated hind femur, but there is no mention of this for X. halidaii. However, iNaturalist observations of males indicate this may be a variable feature within a species and therefore not a suitable diagnostic character.

There is a match between features in specimen C and nearly all of the diagnostic characters for X. amenaida, including the saw morphology. The one character that does not match is the punctation of the middle region of the vertex, which is reported to be unpunctured in X. amenaida but which appears to be densely punctured in specimen C.

Examination of the holotype specimen of X. amenaida may help to clarify this discrepancy.


Additional information for species delimitation

  1. BOLD specimen of male Xyloperga halidaii - SICOD1430-19 Specimen determination: Jeremy deWaard

Specimen B matches this BOLD specimen of X. halidaii closely in all visible features.

 

2. Images of type specimens of X. halidaii and X. amenaida from SAMA,

  • determined by Forsius (1927). Images kindly supplied by Ben Parslow, SAMA.

Xyloperga amenaida type specimen

Male specimen shares following features with BOLD specimen of male X. halidaii above:
- genae narrower than eye width
- mesepisternum with a wide yellow transverse stripe (however background colour is brown rather than black)
- hind femur dilated

This may suggest that the species determination of either the SAMA specimen or the BOLD specimen is incorrect. Further information - in particular, images of the holotype of both X. halidaii and X. amenaida - is required to decide between these alternatives.

Xyloperga halidaii type specimen

The preservation of this specimen is too poor to decide whether the species determination by Forsius of X. halidaii is correct or incorrect.


Images of holotypes of X. amenaida and X. halidaii

I hope to obtain images of the holotypes of X. amenaida (from BMNH) and X. halidaii (from OXUM).


This information should help species identification of specimens A, B, C and the overall goal of aligning features visible in field photographs with the original species descriptions of X. halidaii and X. amenaida.


References:

Benson, R.B. 1939. A revision of the Australian sawflies of the genus Perga Leach, sens. lat. (Hymenoptera, Symphyta). The Australian Zoologist 9: 324-357

Kirby, W.F. 1882. List of Hymenoptera, with descriptions and figures of the typical specimens in the British Museum. Vol. I. Tenthredinidae and Siricidae. London: British Museum, xxviii

Morice, F.D. 1919. Notes on Australian sawflies, especially the “Authors' Types” and other specimens in the British Museum of Natural History and the Hope Collections of the Oxford University Museum; with diagnostic synopses of the genera and species, and photographs illustrating their structural characters. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 66: 247-333, pls XI-XV.

Westwood, J.O. 1880. A monograph of the sawflies composing the Australian genus Perga of Leach. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1880: 359-379


This is a workbook page … a part of our website where we record the observations and references used in making species identifications. The notes will not necessarily be complete. They are a record for our own use, but we are happy to share this information with others.